I first discovered this and a few others (some SFW, some not) nearly a month and a half ago. Here's a SFW exposé on Oxhorn and his shit. If Bethesda can sock homophobic FO76 players with lifetime bans, they can do the right thing and cut ties with that neckbearded, cigar-chomping, scotch-swilling, power-tripping bigot. Oxhorn is also a hypocrite he wrote in his "Manlyfesto" (the same one where he runs down gays and glorifies greed) that he thinks porn is "un-manly" but has no problem with using nude mods in FO4. He views anyone who criticizes FO4 as "toxic", as if Bethesda can do no wrong. He acts condescending to his own fans, again, whenever they correct him. He thinks greed is good, stating that his goal is to get very rich so he can bring about a "great change". As for the racism, there's some old blog posts and the fact that he whitewashes nonwhite characters in FNV through mods. The homophobia and transphobia can be traced to old posts (i.e., "Rainbow Rights" and one other written shortly before it) along with video of Oxhorn, his brother, and two other people bitching out a guy for asking if Oxhorn would date him. The atheist-bashing was back during Oxhorn's WoW days, when he killed an atheist character in a Machinima. He also has a history of hate he's bashed atheists, gay people, trans people, and anyone who isn't white. He abuses his influence as a large YouTube channel and content creator to shut down smaller channels, especially whenever they disagree with or correct him on anything. Preferably someone who actually gives a shit about whether their games work on as many platforms as possible.Īlso, CUT OFF TIES TO BRANDON "OXHORN" DENNIS! He sells bootleg Fallout shirts, which is PIRACY. Todd Howard only sees dollar signs instead of games and gamers.
How have they not had a class-action lawsuit brought against them for making faulty products and releasing them with the knowledge that they were defective? HOW? and they wasted the option in favor of "TES-in the 1950's".Ĭlick to expand.Bethesda needs 1) new management, and 2) proper quality checks and testing to make sure their games actually WORK RIGHT. My own disappointment from the outset of FO3-specifically, was that their engine was totally capable of rendering all NPCs at the fidelity and appearance of the original Fallout 1&2 cutscenes. What is meant by dated graphics, in this context? That just wouldn't do for the TES & TES-FO maps. are trying to be, and second, tend to have less flexible lighting, and harshly optimized level geometry. a lot of the engines/recent titles that are considerably more realistic looking -first. Bethesda's NPC Ghouls look like crap -in a bad way their feral ghouls, not so much.Īs I understand it. Which meant that only the feral (creature-class) ghouls actually looked right for the setting. The issue I had with their graphics (for FO3) was that they copped out on the ghoul faces, in favor of using Face-Gen for features and lip-sync. I don't get the complaints about the graphics never have.
0 kommentar(er)
